Planning your 2026 spray season just got complicated FCC Part 15 regulations 1. Our engineering team has tracked the FCC’s December 2025 Covered List update 2, and farmers now face a foreign drone blackout. Without proper RF compliance, your fleet investment could stall at customs or face operational bans.
When buying agricultural drones for the US market, FCC Part 15 regulations govern RF power limits. Intentional radiators like 2.4GHz controllers must not exceed 1W conducted power. The FCC’s 2025 Covered List now restricts new foreign drone authorizations, requiring buyers to verify FCC IDs and prioritize US-made or Blue UAS certified equipment.
Let me walk you through each critical regulation and show you how to keep your fleet compliant while maintaining the range and stability your operations demand.
How do I ensure my imported agricultural drones comply with FCC Part 15 power limit regulations?
When we calibrate RF modules at our facility, Part 15 compliance is always the first checkpoint Remote Identification of Drones 3. Many importers overlook this step and face costly delays. The rules seem complex, but they follow a clear pattern once you understand the basics.
To ensure FCC Part 15 compliance, verify your drone's FCC ID on fcc.gov, confirm RF power output stays within band-specific EIRP limits, and obtain proper equipment authorization. Controllers and telemetry systems need Certification for intentional radiators, while flight controllers require Supplier's Declaration of Conformity for unintentional emissions.

Understanding Part 15 Categories
FCC Part 15 divides RF devices into two main categories. Intentional radiators 4 actively transmit signals. These include your drone controller, video transmitter, and telemetry links. Unintentional radiators emit RF as a byproduct of operation. Flight controllers, ESCs, and motors fall into this category.
Each category requires different authorization pathways. Intentional radiators must go through FCC Certification. This involves lab testing and formal approval. Unintentional radiators typically need only a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity 5. However, both must meet strict emission limits.
Key Power Limits for Agricultural Drone Frequencies
Our production team regularly tests against these FCC limits. Here is a reference table for common agricultural drone frequencies:
| Frequency Band | Common Use | Max Conducted Power | EIRP Limit | FCC Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GHz | Controller/WiFi | 1W (30 dBm) | 4W with antenna gain | Part 15.247 |
| 5.8 GHz | FPV Video | 25-200 mW | Band-specific | Part 15.247 |
| 900 MHz (ISM) | Long-range telemetry | 1W (30 dBm) | 4W EIRP | Part 15.247 |
| 5 GHz UNII | Data links | 1W indoor | 4W outdoor EIRP | Part 15.407 |
For agricultural spraying operations, the 900 MHz band is particularly valuable. It offers longer range for large field coverage. However, you must stay within the 1W conducted power limit.
Step-by-Step Compliance Verification
First, locate the FCC ID on your drone and controller. This number is usually printed on a label or stored in the device's software. Enter it at fcc.gov/oet/ea/fccid to verify active authorization.
Second, check the test reports. These documents show actual measured power output. Our engineers always request these from suppliers before shipping to US customers.
Third, confirm the device is not on the FCC Covered List. Since December 2025, new foreign-made drones from certain manufacturers cannot receive FCC authorization. Existing authorized models remain legal, but new model variants face restrictions.
EMC Testing Requirements
Beyond power limits, FCC requires electromagnetic compatibility testing 6. This ensures your drone's electronics do not cause harmful interference. Flight controllers, ESCs, and battery management systems must pass EMC standards under Part 15 Subpart B.
At our testing lab, we simulate real-world conditions. Motors running at full throttle while the controller transmits data. This comprehensive approach catches issues before they become customs problems.
Will US RF power restrictions impact the signal range and transmission stability of my drone fleet?
In our experience exporting to the US, this question comes up in nearly every conversation. Farmers worry that legal power limits will cripple their large-field operations. The reality is more nuanced than a simple yes or no.
US RF power restrictions do affect potential range, but compliant drones can still achieve 5-10 km operational distances through optimized antenna design, frequency selection, and protocol efficiency. The 1W limit on 900 MHz telemetry provides excellent range for agricultural applications when properly implemented.

How Power Limits Affect Range
Radio signal strength decreases with distance according to the inverse square law 7. Doubling power does not double range. It only increases range by about 41%. This means the difference between a legal 1W system and an illegal 4W system is smaller than most people expect.
What matters more is receiver sensitivity and antenna efficiency. Our engineers focus on these factors rather than pushing power limits. A well-designed 1W system often outperforms a poorly designed higher-power system.
Frequency Selection for Agricultural Operations
Different frequencies offer different range characteristics:
| Frequency | Range Potential | Obstacle Penetration | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 MHz | Excellent (10+ km) | Good | Large open fields, BVLOS |
| 2.4 GHz | Good (5-8 km) | Moderate | General operations |
| 5.8 GHz | Limited (1-3 km) | Poor | Short-range video |
For agricultural spraying, we recommend 900 MHz telemetry combined with 2.4 GHz control. This dual-band approach maximizes both range and reliability while staying within FCC limits.
Stability Factors Beyond Power
Signal stability depends on several factors beyond raw power output. Frequency hopping spread spectrum technology 8 helps avoid interference. Error correction protocols recover lost data packets. Antenna diversity provides redundancy when one path is blocked.
Our flight controllers implement all these technologies. During testing on 500-acre fields, we maintain stable connections at distances that would have required illegal power levels just five years ago.
Real-World Performance Data
Here is what we see in actual agricultural deployments:
| Configuration | Legal Power | Typical Range | Stability Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 900 MHz + directional antenna | 1W | 8-12 km | Excellent |
| 2.4 GHz + omnidirectional | 1W | 3-5 km | Good |
| Dual-band redundant | 1W each | 6-10 km | Excellent |
The key insight is that antenna selection matters enormously. A high-gain directional antenna at the ground station can dramatically extend range without increasing transmitted power.
Environmental Interference Considerations
Agricultural environments present unique challenges. Metal buildings cause reflections. Power lines create electrical noise. Crop height changes throughout the season.
We design our systems to handle these variables. Adaptive frequency selection automatically avoids congested channels. Power control algorithms optimize output for current conditions. These smart features maintain stability without exceeding legal limits.
Can I request custom RF configurations from my drone manufacturer while staying within US legal limits?
When customers approach us about custom configurations, the answer is usually yes. Our development team regularly creates region-specific RF profiles. The challenge is understanding exactly what can be customized and what is fixed by regulation.
Yes, manufacturers can provide custom RF configurations within FCC limits. Options include frequency band selection, antenna type, power output profiles, and protocol optimization. However, any intentional radiator modification requires new FCC Certification. Request documentation proving the custom configuration has valid authorization.

What Can Be Customized
RF customization falls into several categories. Some changes are simple software adjustments. Others require hardware modifications and new certifications.
Software-level customizations include channel selection within approved bands, power output reduction, and protocol timing adjustments. These changes typically do not require new FCC Certification if they stay within the parameters of the original authorization.
Hardware customizations are more complex. Changing antenna type, adding frequency bands, or modifying RF amplifier stages all require new testing and certification.
Customization Options and Requirements
| Customization Type | Requires New Certification | Typical Lead Time | Cost Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Channel selection | No | 1-2 weeks | Minimal |
| Power reduction | No | 1-2 weeks | Minimal |
| Antenna change (same band) | Sometimes | 4-8 weeks | Moderate |
| New frequency band | Yes | 12-16 weeks | Significant |
| Custom protocol | Yes | 16-20 weeks | Significant |
Working with Your Manufacturer
At our facility, we have a dedicated team for US market customizations. Here is our typical process:
First, we discuss your operational requirements. Field size, terrain, and existing equipment all influence the optimal configuration. We need to understand your specific use case.
Second, we review FCC requirements together. If your request falls within our existing authorizations, we can proceed quickly. If not, we explain the certification timeline and costs.
Third, we provide documentation. Every custom configuration ships with test reports, FCC ID verification, and a compliance statement. This paperwork is essential for customs clearance.
Common Custom Requests
Agricultural operators often request similar modifications. Extended range for large fields is the most common. We address this through antenna upgrades and frequency optimization rather than power increases.
Interference resistance is another frequent request. Farms near airports or military bases face unique RF environments. We can configure frequency hopping patterns to avoid problem channels.
Multi-drone coordination requires careful RF planning. When running swarm operations with three drones per pilot, each unit needs distinct identification. We configure Remote ID broadcasts and telemetry channels to prevent conflicts.
Avoiding Certification Pitfalls
Some modifications seem minor but trigger certification requirements. For example, changing the antenna connector type requires new testing even if the antenna itself is identical. Updating firmware that affects RF parameters may also need review.
We always recommend discussing modifications before purchase. Our compliance team can identify which changes are simple and which require additional investment. This transparency prevents surprises during import.
What RF compliance certifications do I need from my supplier to avoid delays at US customs?
Our shipping department handles customs documentation daily. We have seen shipments held for weeks over missing paperwork. The requirements are specific, and incomplete documentation causes the most delays.
To avoid US customs delays, require suppliers to provide FCC ID certificates for all RF modules, test reports from accredited labs, Declaration of Conformity documents, and verification that products are not on the FCC Covered List. For agricultural drones, also request FAA Part 89 Remote ID compliance documentation.

Essential Documentation Checklist
Every agricultural drone shipment to the US should include these documents:
| Document | Purpose | Who Issues It | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCC ID Certificate | Proves RF authorization | FCC via grantee | Permanent unless revoked |
| Test Report | Shows compliance testing | Accredited lab | Valid for specific configuration |
| DoC | Manufacturer declaration | Supplier | Per model/shipment |
| Covered List Clearance | National security verification | Importer verification | Check at time of import |
| Remote ID Compliance | FAA tracking requirement | Manufacturer | Per model |
Understanding the FCC Covered List
The December 2025 Covered List update significantly impacts agricultural drone imports. This list identifies foreign manufacturers whose new products cannot receive FCC authorization due to national security concerns.
Critical point: existing FCC authorizations remain valid. If a drone model received FCC certification before the Covered List update, it can still be legally imported and used. The restriction applies to new model authorizations.
When we prepare shipments, we include documentation showing when FCC authorization was granted. This timestamp proves the authorization predates any listing.
Lab Accreditation Requirements
FCC accepts test reports only from accredited laboratories. The lab must hold ISO 17025 accreditation and FCC recognition. Reports from non-accredited labs will be rejected.
Our products are tested at multiple accredited facilities. We can provide reports from US-based labs if customers prefer domestic testing verification. This sometimes speeds customs review.
Remote ID Documentation
Since September 2023, FAA requires Remote ID capability on all drones. This intersects with FCC compliance because Remote ID uses RF broadcasts. Your documentation should show both FCC authorization for the Remote ID transmitter and FAA compliance certification.
For agricultural operations under Part 137, additional documentation may apply. We include FAA exemption guidance with our agricultural drone shipments.
Pre-Shipment Verification Process
Before any shipment leaves our facility, we complete a verification checklist:
- Confirm FCC ID is active in FCC database
- Verify no Covered List conflicts
- Include complete test reports
- Prepare Declaration of Conformity
- Add Remote ID compliance certificate
- Document any custom configurations
This systematic approach has reduced our customers' customs delays by over 80% compared to industry averages.
Working with Customs Brokers
We recommend using a customs broker experienced with drone imports. They understand FCC documentation requirements and can identify problems before they cause delays.
Provide your broker with all RF compliance documentation in advance. They can pre-clear paperwork with CBP, dramatically reducing processing time at port of entry.
Conclusion
US RF regulations for agricultural drones center on FCC Part 15 power limits and the 2025 Covered List updates. Compliance requires verified FCC IDs, proper documentation, and awareness of national security restrictions. With careful planning and the right supplier partnership, your fleet can operate legally and effectively across any field size.
Footnotes
1. Direct link to the official Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47, Part 15. ↩︎
2. Official FCC page explaining the Covered List and its purpose. ↩︎
3. Official FAA page providing information on drone Remote ID. ↩︎
4. Provides the official FCC definition of intentional radiators. ↩︎
5. Official FCC guidance on Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC). ↩︎
6. Official FCC information on electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing requirements. ↩︎
7. Explains the fundamental physics principle governing signal strength attenuation. ↩︎
8. Describes how frequency hopping spread spectrum technology enhances signal reliability. ↩︎
9. Official FCC page for verifying and understanding FCC IDs. ↩︎